#CloseTheGap — Cara A. Brown
Results at a Glance
$31K Raised in approximately 3 months
100% Staff participation — 12 staff fundraisers activated
65% Recurring donors — 100% were net-new to the organization
10K+ Campaign impressions · 718 link clicks · National Giving Tuesday reach
Giving Tuesday · Dec 1

Hit the $10K #GivingTuesday goal with matching — on a single day — as part of a broader campaign that funded 8 programs, served 500+ students, and supported $300K in Apple equipment purchases for Oakland youth with no computer or internet access at home.

The Gap

EOYDC ran on grants. Individual giving wasn't a system — it was sporadic and unmeasured.

14,000 kids in Oakland lack access to computers or internet. 40% of Oakland Unified students have no device or connection at home. Castlemont High alone had 282 of 564 students without the basics. The need was documented, the organization was proven, and funding existed through grants — but individual giving was untapped.

There was no campaign name, no visual identity, no content system, no staff enablement, no peer-to-peer infrastructure, no donor recognition pathway, and no measurement framework. Every element had to be built before any giving could begin.

The overall fundraising goal was $50,000 — with a $5K/month recurring target as the structural objective, because recurring donors compound over time in a way that one-time gifts don't. The campaign needed to produce that infrastructure, not just the cheque.

Without a repeatable system, any success in year one would require a full rebuild in year two. The design goal wasn't just a successful campaign — it was an organization that knew how to run one.

A campaign raises money once. A system raises money every year — and gets easier each time.

What I Built

Six interconnected layers — each one designed to work independently and reinforce the others.

01 — Name + Narrative

#CloseTheGap — campaign identity and donor impact framing

Named the campaign, built the narrative architecture, and created the donor impact framing that translated EOYDC's work into language that moved people to give. The name was designed to anchor across channels — social, email, P2P pages, and in-person — while connecting directly to the digital equity problem it addressed.

02 — Visual Identity + Content System

Consistent cross-channel brand — posts, signatures, collateral, pages

Built a visual identity and content system that ran consistently across every touchpoint: social media posts, email signatures, fundraising pages, collateral, and partner materials. Every asset was templated for reuse — so staff didn't have to create from scratch each time they needed to activate their networks.

03 — Staff + Board Enablement

Ready-to-use toolkits and incentive structure for 100% activation

Designed and distributed toolkits for 12 staff fundraisers, 10 board fundraisers, and 3 partner fundraisers — with everything they needed to activate their personal networks without requiring help or improvisation. Incentive and recognition mechanics were built in from the start, not added as an afterthought. 100% staff participation was the result.

04 — Peer-to-Peer Infrastructure

21 fundraising pages · 47 manual donations entered · P2P architecture

Built the peer-to-peer fundraising infrastructure on Network for Good — including 21 individual fundraising pages and the operational support to capture 47 manual donations that came in outside the platform. The P2P layer was what made staff and board activation measurable, not just encouraged.

05 — Gamification + Recognition

Leaderboards, milestones, and recognition pathways built into the cadence

Designed gamification mechanics — leaderboards, milestone markers, and donor recognition pathways — to sustain momentum across a multi-month campaign window. Gamification wasn't decoration; it was the mechanism that kept staff engaged after the launch energy faded and drove the recurring donor rate.

06 — #GivingTuesday Integration

National campaign activation with $10K goal + matching

Structured the #GivingTuesday activation as a distinct moment within the larger campaign — with its own goal ($10K + matching), messaging, and social media push — while keeping it connected to the broader #CloseTheGap narrative. National platform reach translated into local donor engagement, with new donors acquired through the giving day who then converted to recurring.

Campaign Creative

Visual identity, content system, and social proof — built for reuse across every channel.

Outcomes
Participation
100% staff activation — 25 total fundraisers

12 staff, 10 board, and 3 partner fundraisers — all equipped with toolkits and incentives. 21 fundraising pages created. 100% staff participation was not an accident; it was a design output.

Donor Quality
65% recurring · 100% net-new donors

Every donor acquired was new to EOYDC. Nearly two-thirds converted to recurring — the structural goal from day one, because recurring donors compound over time in ways one-time gifts don't.

System Built
Repeatable infrastructure — not a one-time campaign

EOYDC left with a reusable system: assets, cadence, channels, and enablement to support ongoing individual giving. Staff and board were equipped and activated. The organization knew how to run the campaign again.

External Recognition

Network for Good featured this campaign as a fundraising success

Network for Good — the platform used to run #CloseTheGap — studied the campaign's fundraising strategy and results as a model for nonprofit peer-to-peer giving. The peer-to-peer architecture, staff enablement approach, and donor conversion rate were cited as standout elements of the campaign design.

View Network for Good case study →

Read the full case study

The complete #CloseTheGap design strategy case study — covering the system architecture, campaign structure, enablement approach, and outcomes in full.

Service Architecture — Fundraising Systems

The gap between having a cause worth funding and having a system people can actually give through is a design problem. #CloseTheGap was built so the answer to "how do we run this again next year?" was already built into the first year.

How I Work →
Skills Demonstrated
Fundraising System Design Campaign Strategy + Naming Visual Identity + Content System Peer-to-Peer Architecture Staff + Board Enablement Gamification + Recognition Design Donor Journey Design Channel Orchestration Nonprofit Operations Impact Measurement

Building a fundraising system — or an organization that can sustain individual giving year over year?

Get in touch